©¦
©¦
©¦
©¦
©¦
©¦
©¦ ©¦ ©¦
¹ú¼Ê»·¾³ÂÛ̳

 

 

 

GEOGRAPHICAL ASSESSMENT OF FOSSIL ENERGY SOURCES



COAL SOURCES

-RESERVES
Of all the fossil fuels, coal is by far the most plentiful in the world. It has been estimated that, as at 1996, there are around one thousand billion (1 x 1012) tonnes of total coal reserves economically accessible using current mining technology, approximately half of it being hard coal. Not only are coal reserves extensive, they are also geographically diverse, being spread over 100 countries and all continents.

Almost 80% of world coal reserves are now concentrated in North America, Asia Pacific and the former Soviet Union. Reserves in Europe, based on calorific value, are estimated at 72 billion tons of coal units (of which 70% is hard coal). Overall, coal represents 80% of fossil fuel reserves in the EU (96% in Eastern Europe). More limited reserves can be found in S. America and Africa. Coal reserves are being used at a far slower rate than oil and gas, particularly within the EU and applicant countries. Plentiful reserves mean a long-lasting supply. At 1998 levels of production, coal reserves are sufficient to last over 200 years,
approximately four times the reserves of oil (some 45 years) and gas (about 65 years).

¡¤PRODUCTION
Hard coal production across the globe has grown over the last 25 years and is likely to go on expanding because of rising demand from developing countries. In 1999, coal production in the EU was 100 million tonnes (Mt), out of a total consumption of 247 Mt, almost all of it dependent on subsidies. Production within Europe is falling and is likely to continue to do so as traditionally large producers continue to scale down production - as in the UK in the 1990s. A similar trend is apparent in Eastern Europe where production fell from some 178 Mt in 1990 to 135 Mt in 1998, mainly lignite in Poland, which will soon no longer be self-sufficient in coal.

A key factor in coal production is cost. Despite its leading position as a developer of clean coal technology, the EU is at a disadvantage for structural and geological reasons. It has many deep mines that are expensive to operate. Drastic cost-reduction programmes have taken place in Germany and the UK, which have reduced their cost and raised productivity - the UK now has the highest productivity among EU producers, but levels of production have been slashed. Similar developments are taking place in France and Spain.Compared to USA, Canada, Australia and S. Africa, productivity in the EU is relatively low. Poland's productivity is several times lower again.

Despite the vast hard coal reserves of the EU and applicant countries, most EU hard coal production has no future without subsidies. Belgium has already ceased indigenous production. France plans to do so by 2005. In the UK, the price of coal delivered to generating companies lies above world levels. The UK coal industry is alone in the EU in receiving no state subsidies, but the number of operating mines and employment in the coal industry are a fraction of what they were 10 years ago.

¡¤DEMAND
EU coal demand is following a determined downward trend, due to the wide-scale removal of coal from domestic households, the substitution of coal fired generation of electricity by gas and the restructuring of the steel industry. Coal has in the past been associated with pollution, and is still a large emitter of CO2. Technological advances (e.g. clean coal programmes) could renew interest in coal, make it more attractive and benefit supply security. Economically, coal offers the advantage over oil and gas of relatively stable prices, partly due to an excess of supply over demand. Over the last 15 years, average coal import prices have fluctuated by no more than 20 $/tce, compared to over 120 $/tce for crude oil. Enlargement could benefit the EU's coal balance if Eastern European coal satisfied some of the demand in the existing EU.

However, a more likely scenario is that restructuring in accession states leads to new falls in production without corresponding falls in demand. The net result is likely to be increased dependence on coal imports. The medium term projection is that demand for coal would increase after 2010, especially for power generation, due to a projected price increase of gas and the decommissioning of ageing nuclear power plants.

¡¤IMPORTS
Imported coal is far cheaper than domestically produced coal. At an average of 42 €/tce, imported coal costs a fraction of, for example, German coal, at 143 €/tce. Coal imports come from a wide range of countries, but mainly from Australia, Canada and USA. This factor reduces
he risk element of dependence on imports. Providing that these reserves are available to European markets, there are more than sufficient alternative low-cost reserves accessible to markets in other parts of the world.

¡¤COAL - CONCLUSIONS
From an economic and energy supply viewpoint, coal is attractive. There are extensive worldwide reserves, including in Europe, and competitive, well supplied markets to keep prices low and stable. However, coal has been phased out from homes (in earlier "clean air" legislation) and, more recently, electricity generation, where gas is the preferred choice. Restructuring of the steel industry has also removed an important customer.


Source: IIASA/WEC



·µ»Ø
¡°Öйú»·¾³ÔÚÏß¡±

Öйú»·¾³±£»¤×ܾÖÐû´«½ÌÓýÖÐÐÄ¡¡±±¾©´óѧ»·¾³Ñ§Ôº
Öйú±´åÇÏîÄ¿°ì¹«ÊÒÖÆ×÷